航运综合

中西非召开海事会议

内容摘要:7月9日-10日,中西非法语国家的海事部门领导人聚集科特迪瓦阿比让,召开首次区域性会议。该会旨在建立论坛,供该区域海事部门决策者交流和分享经验和想法,了解当前IMO的工

环境保护

另一个北海石油平台

3月4日,当地时间,TAQA石油公司称:北海石油平台被发现碳烃化合物泄漏之后就紧急疏散了几十名工人。阿布扎比公司表示:当地时间周六Cormorant Alpha平台上有145名工人,其中71名从苏格兰东北海岸的石油钻井平台上撤离下来。而且该公司还在声明中表示没有发生碳氢化合物泄漏。


该公司称其中一个钻井平台的桩腿在维修过程中被发现泄漏问题。


随后便采取预防措施

航运市场

长荣遗产争夺战愈演

长荣遗产争夺战愈演愈烈 海运业务将面临巨变

海事动态

温州乐清湾海事处联

温州乐清湾海事处联合边防开展联合执法行动

独家报道
独家报道

“Marigold”号散装船机舱失火

来源:国际海员服务中心网 2016-04-22 14:18:05 责任编辑: 人气:

内容摘要:“Marigold”号散装船在西澳大利亚州黑德兰港卸载铁矿石货物过程中,机舱发生火灾。该船船员使用了卤代烷气体灭火系统,但未成功完全释放卤代烷气体,机舱也未有效封闭,导致火灾持续了约12个小时,直到火势烧尽。

澳大利亚交通安全局(ATSB)发布了一项报告,其有关于“Marigold”号散装船在西澳大利亚州黑德兰港卸载铁矿石货物过程中,机舱发生火灾。该船船员实施灭火行动以扑灭机舱的火灾,其中使用了卤代烷气体灭火系统。然而,未成功完全释放卤代烷气体,机舱也未有效封闭。所以导致火灾持续了约12个小时,直到火势烧尽。

经ATSB确认,火灾始源于“Marigold”号的第一发电机上未成功安装燃油管。燃油因此喷射,很可能触及到了发电机的高温面,并引发火灾。使用该船的卤代烷气体灭火系统并未起到任何作用,因为未成功完全释放卤代烷气体且机舱未有效封闭。

卤代烷气体灭火系统的失效以及通风装置关闭机制的多重故障表明船上缺乏有效的维护计划。他们启动了港口应急反应计划,但是,关于事故响应初始阶段过程中他人担任的角色,相关响应机构之间存在分歧。他们的应急计划未涉及控制转移的触发点,或包含如何在事故过程中转移控制权的详细指令。

ATSB 建议,在港口实施大型火灾响应行动与该船的船员和岸上灭火作业组有关。船舶船员实施初始灭火反应行动,须具备全面的知识以及了解灭火程序与系统,而这些程序和系统须得到有效维护。无论有多少岸上响应机构参与响应行动,他们的应急系统都必须相互协调,这样的话,个人和团队角色与责任就十分明确,并可确保响应机构携手完成有效的响应行动。

——本文属ISSC独家编译 转载须署名来源国际海员服务中心网!

“Marigold”号散装船机舱失火_副本.jpg

 

Engine room fire on board the bulk carrier Marigold

ATSB has issued report regarding a fire which started in the engine room of the bulk carrier Marigold, while it was loading a cargo of iron ore in Port Hedland, Western Australia. Firefighting by the ship’s crew included activating the Halon gas fixed fire suppression system for the engine room. However, a full release of Halon gas did not occur, nor was the engine room effectively sealed. Consequently, the fire continued for about 12 hours until it burnt itself out.

The ATSB determined that the fire began on Marigold’s number one generator after a fuel oil pipe fitting on it failed. The resulting spray of fuel oil likely contacted a hot surface on the generator and ignited. The deployment of the ship’s Halon gas fixed fire suppression system was ineffective, as a full release of Halon gas did not occur and the engine room was not effectively sealed.

Failures within the Halon system and multiple failures of the ventilation closing mechanisms were indicative of a lack of effective planned maintenance on board. The port’s emergency response plan was initiated, but there were misunderstandings between the agencies involved as to the roles of the others during the initial stages of the incident and response. Their emergency plans did not refer to trigger points for transfer of control or include detailed instructions of how to hand over control during an incident.

ATSB advises that response to a large fire on board a ship in port will involve the ship’s crew and shore fire crews. The initial response and fire containment by the ship’s crew requires a thorough knowledge and understanding of firefighting procedures and systems, which needs to be effectively maintained. Where multiple shore response agencies are involved, their emergency procedures need to be consistent with each other, such that individual and team roles and responsibilities are well understood and ensure that agencies can coordinate an effective response.

来源:Safety4sea

标签:
上一篇:NTSB:再次展开搜寻以找回“El Faro”号航行记录仪 下一篇:很抱歉没有了

相关新闻阅读:

    无相关信息

发表评论(共有条)

看不清?
发表评论

最新评论